Anne Hathaway In Theyskens’ Theory – Vanity Fair Campaign Hollywood 2013

Anne Hathaway In Theyskens' Theory - Vanity Fair Campaign Hollywood 2013Similar to Jennifer Lawrence, Anne Hathaway attended a separate Vanity Fair Campaign Hollywood 2013 event, hosted last night at Eveleigh restaurant in Los Angeles, California.

It was a celebration of ‘Les Miserables’ in support of The Los Angeles Fund for Public Education, but I wasn’t celebrating Anne’s Theyskens’ Theory Spring 2013 dress quite so much.

Did the fur-lined shrug provided a dose of vintage glam? Yes. Did it work here? Not as well.

The fuzzy coat was a strange pairing for the sporty perforated dress underneath. Plus, it covered up the most interesting detail of the design: the slightly exaggerated sleeve seen on the runway.

A berry lip and a metallic sandal tried to counteract the understated neutral shades. I’m not sure they were successful.

Credit: & Getty

Cameron Silver In Joseph Abboud & Andrea Pompilio

Cameron Silver In Joseph Abboud & Andrea Pompilio

Menswear Midweek Round Up

Menswear Midweek Round Up

16 Responses to Anne Hathaway In Theyskens’ Theory – Vanity Fair Campaign Hollywood 2013

  1. Cameron February 23, 2013 at 10:47 pm #

    Love the Jill Milan 450 Sutter clutch here.

  2. Jess2 February 23, 2013 at 1:38 pm #

    The coat isn’t working and I don’t like how she styled her hair on this occasion.

  3. Louise February 22, 2013 at 9:51 am #

    Wow, she changed her hair colour! And she’s not in black! Not sure if I like the entire look, but I love how it’s finally something different

  4. Mari February 22, 2013 at 3:01 am #

    The jacket is a “vegan” jacket. Not sure what that means but I guess it doesn’t eat meat (!).
    Have theory re. Anne’s fashion choices this awards season and why they’ve been so hit/miss: she’s gone hardcore vegan and won’t wear any animal, not just leather but wool or even silk. She wore a bit of silk earlier during the Les Mis tour but not much. Im trying to find out what some of her outfits are made of to test this.

  5. EmmaWoodhouse February 22, 2013 at 1:22 am #

    The dress is too short, to start with. The jacket is odd over it–it would have worked better with a plain, knee-length cream colored sheath. There is a total disconnect between shoes and jacket.

  6. Cass February 22, 2013 at 12:48 am #

    May be the minority but I think she looks good in this ensemble.

    • Yeliz February 22, 2013 at 5:12 am #

      I’m with you. She looks really nice.

  7. jeremyrain February 21, 2013 at 11:36 pm #

    Surprise how it’s in LA and yet she’s in the most cover-up so far.

  8. TeaAtTwo February 21, 2013 at 10:36 pm #

    It’s a cool dress though a tad short though I guess the length suits the sporty vibe of the dress. I’m fine with the jacket, I think she looks cute. if it prevents revealing her breasts under the flashlights like it does on the runway then it’s smart move.

    • Mol February 22, 2013 at 12:48 am #

      I agree, there is something that works in all this for me, even if it doesn’t follow a prescribed logic.

      • Quinn February 22, 2013 at 1:15 am #


  9. Marisa February 21, 2013 at 9:36 pm #

    NO, ANNE, NO!

  10. Marybeth February 21, 2013 at 9:29 pm #

    I like the dress a lot.
    I like the jacket too but NOT with this dress or those shoes. What was she thinking?

    • Mari February 21, 2013 at 11:07 pm #

      A light looking dress and sandals and a heavy furred jacket? Nope.

  11. dee February 21, 2013 at 9:09 pm #

    Why this jacket? I don’t really like it covering up the dress which is light. The jacket weighs this down. If anything a light, leather jacket would have looked better or no jacket at all.

    • Christine February 22, 2013 at 2:26 am #

      +1 no to the styling.

Leave a Reply

Latest on Red Carpet fashion Awards