Sarah Jessica Parker joined Kate Hudson on the red carpet last night for amfAR’s Inspiration Gala at Milk Studios California.
The actress wore a vintage Chanel jumpsuit.
Her spaghetti-strap look was styled with a quilted black sequin jacket which she removed once inside the venue.
This look is so simple, but I’m sure many of you are groaning that SJP appeared to over-accessorize again.
I mean what does she need to carry that would required a bag that big on the red carpet and does she really need three necklaces with this look?
Black Manolo Blahnik pumps and wavy tresses provided the finishing touches.
-
- Sarah Jessica Parker in vintage Chanel
-
- Sarah Jessica Parker in vintage Chanel
-
- Sarah Jessica Parker in vintage Chanel
Credit: Getty
- Tweet
- Tell us what you think »
- 20 Comments
MORE FROM RED CARPET FASHION AWARDS:
Posted by Catherine Kallon on October 12th, 2012 In: amfAR Gala, Chanel, Sarah Jessica Parker
Heather Graham In Max Azria – ‘The Hangover III’ London Premiere
Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge In Emilia Wickstead – Queen Elizabeth II H...
Zhang Ziyi In Chanel Couture – ‘Only God Forgives’ Cannes Film Festival Premiere
Elsa Zylberstein In Armani – ‘Only God Forgives’ Cannes Film Festival Premiere
Astrid Berges-Frisbey In Chanel Couture – ‘Only God Forgives’...
Kristin Scott Thomas In Armani Privé – ‘Only God Forgives’ Ca...
im more bother by the fact she has 3 necklaces on than the big bag. saying that without the necklaces this look would be utterly boring.
She actually has on 3 necklaces. She should have worn just the tassel necklace and a small clutch. I like everything else.
She needs to hem her pants.
Not to mention the trousers hem needed to be hitched upa couple of inches too..
I don’t think she over-accesorized this time. Coat, weird bag and hemline aside I’m actually quite in love with her look. Flawless hair and makeup.
Meh. She overaccessorizes 90% of her looks that she looks ridiculous. But this look is meh.
70% of the time Chanel is FRUMPY, AGING and BORING.
+1
okay, the bag must GO..but otherwise she looks terrific!
From a distance, the pile of necklaces looks like a very nice statement piece, in my opinion. The second picture looks really good to me.
+1. I like the necklaces in the second look sans bag/jacket.
Agreed. Without the detailed jacket, the necklaces work perfectly as a statement element that along with her loose hair elevate this very simple look. It’s when the jacket comes into play, all the elements start competing with each other.
+1 agree, I like the look, which is weird considering its chanel
I like it. Very flattering look for her head to toe.
Ok so not thrilled about the bag but otherwise I think she looks really great. The nackalces don’t bother me at all
minus the jacket, I think she looks great. Although I would have loved it even more if she lost the 2 smaller smaller necklaces.
I really haven’t liked her style recently. Plus, every appearance is like a ninetines catwalk – she wears a jacket then takes it off.
Also, my sister’s favourite recent fashion reference in SATC the movie, when Carrie wears a black strapless jumpsuit and a stack of gold bangles and looked divine, so I wish she had gone for somethign similar here. Basically, teh necklace works on no levels with this look, statement earrings, ring, bracelet – yes, necklace – no.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_56RT-HC2xcA/Si_IcZcirLI/AAAAAAAAAOI/u6OBwP6hER0/s320/sex-and-the-city.jpg
I think she looks good, but I don’t understand why she always carries big bags on red carpets, and even if she wants to carry lots of things with her, which I can understand, why doesn’t she give the bag to somebody when she poses for the photos?!?
This whole look is boring and dated.
This jumpsuit looks great on her!
I seriously saw this and thought, What the HECK is this? It looks so dated! And silly! She has no charm for me as far as her style goes.