Rihanna For Look Magazine

Whilst browsing magazines in my local supermarket today I came across Look magazine and realized that something wasn’t quite right.

Then it dawned on me that since returning to her raven locks, Rihanna hasn’t worn a fuchsia-pink dress.

What the Photoshop team have done is flip horizontally the picture of Rihanna wearing a green Giorgio Armani dress so the split is to the left, changed the colour of the dress to pink then added the head of Rihanna from the ‘Battleship’ Japan premiere.

I guess this is one of the dilemmas publications face when trying to keep up with a cover star who keeps changing her hairstyle, but it seems like a lot of work.

Surely it would’ve been easier to just put the picture of Rihanna from the ‘Battleship’ premiere on the cover? No?

Credit: Look facebook & Getty

Emma Watson In J. Mendel - 'Noah' Madrid Premiere

Emma Watson In J. Mendel – ‘Noah’ Madrid Premiere

Us Weekly Hot Hollywood Style Event

Us Weekly Hot Hollywood Style Event

27 Responses to Rihanna For Look Magazine

  1. Hannah April 19, 2012 at 17:40 #

    They also changed the background, the side the slit was on the dress, and the background!

  2. Rebecca Z April 19, 2012 at 17:41 #

    If I were her, I’d sue.

  3. Alina April 19, 2012 at 17:46 #

    Seriously? I’m in shock.

  4. mm April 19, 2012 at 17:52 #

    Investigative reporting at its best!

    • Fashion Critic April 19, 2012 at 18:05 #

      LOL :D

      • Jeremy April 19, 2012 at 19:48 #

        This is just like fashion Sherlock. A little guilty pleasure sure is good.

  5. Victoria April 19, 2012 at 18:04 #

    The more I look at that photos, the worse the photoshopping looks

  6. TeuntjeVDW April 19, 2012 at 18:05 #


  7. robbie April 19, 2012 at 18:06 #

    they probably saw the horrible pyjama ensembles she has been sporting lately and went for something a little nicer.

  8. Cristine April 19, 2012 at 18:15 #


  9. alex April 19, 2012 at 18:27 #

    i’ve seen Look do this with a picture of Kate Middleton before too!

  10. alex April 19, 2012 at 18:30 #

    I’ve seen Look magazine do this with a picture of Kate Middleton before


    • Fashion Critic April 19, 2012 at 18:35 #

      omg…i just don’t get why.

    • Marvel April 19, 2012 at 19:13 #

      LOL. TBF that dress looks better than the original. LMFAO

  11. Yeliz April 19, 2012 at 18:31 #

    I’ve noticed a lot of photoshopping on magazine covers but this is the most ridiculous one.

  12. EmmaWoodhouse April 19, 2012 at 18:39 #

    This is so silly! “Oh, Rihanna won’t pose for us so we’ll just make up a picture of her from her last thirty red carpet outings! No one will know!”

  13. Riley April 19, 2012 at 19:40 #

    Look magazine does not deserve a look.

  14. vicky April 19, 2012 at 20:25 #

    Not surprised, this seem to be what tabloids and celeb mags do for a living these days.
    OK Magazine has been doing this for years, with the Beckham’s being one of their favourite subject to photoshop.
    The public (not fans/followers) think they’re posing for magazines 24/7 (whoring publicity) when in fact it’s the magazine who’s to blame for simply re-using and photoshop old images.

  15. GirlOne April 19, 2012 at 20:46 #

    How is this even legal?

    • jkrau April 20, 2012 at 04:55 #

      I was wondering the same thing! Between laughing hysterically, of course.

  16. Giuseppi Giraffe April 19, 2012 at 20:52 #

    HA! Wow- good catch. I wonder why they didn’t just use an existing shot :P

    • Rebecca Z April 20, 2012 at 00:38 #

      They didn’t want to pay for it.

  17. Carolina Roq April 19, 2012 at 22:03 #


  18. Annel April 20, 2012 at 02:38 #

    Wow, impressed by the Sherlock Holmes-like skills in identifying fashion items that must lie behind this post!

    And yeah, wonder why they did all that work – but I guess that despite the half a million other stars to choose from they still believe at it sells better with Rihanna on the front page, so in that way it pays off..

  19. Teleholic April 20, 2012 at 03:23 #

    Fashionista just credited you with figuring this out :)


    You go, girl!

    • Fashion Critic April 20, 2012 at 07:13 #

      Thanks for daring. Love it x

  20. Lala/S-R April 27, 2012 at 07:25 #

    ROFL. Saw this somewhere else too and got a chuckle. So clearly photoshoped.

    AND, “Surely it would’ve been easier to just put the picture of Rihanna from the ‘Battleship’ premiere on the cover? No?” NOPE, FC! Wasn’t an option. That pyjama outfit was just terrible.

Leave a Reply

Latest on Red Carpet fashion Awards