
The tagline for the issue is appropriately title “Carey Mulligan: Naughty But Nice – The star of Shame sheds her good-girl image.”
Carey’s high dramatically editorial, shot by Michael Thompson was given a 60s theatrical styling treatment by Edward Enninful.
The editorial sees her wearing Louis Vuitton, the one person who I hope will bring this Spring 2012 collection alive on the red carpet, Prada, Miu Miu, Jean Paul Gaultier and Rochas.
In her interview the British actress talks about nude scenes and her unsettling and haunting new film, ‘Shame’.
Here are some extracts.
On her nude scene: “I’ve never, never been naked in a film before; I’ve been topless once or twice, but always in sort of very innocent ways. And I’ve always been sort of staunchly feminist about it, I’ve never relished the idea of doing it, and never if it was inappropriate or gratuitous in any way. But I just felt it was absolutely right; that’s exactly who she was. She wanted to be seen, she’s an exhibitionist and she’s provocative.”
On feeling confident playing a character who didn’t worry about her appearance: “I didn’t have to worry about what I ate, or how much I drank, and I didn’t have to work out. She was an alcoholic mess. She didn’t have any money to dye her hair. I mean I didn’t become an alcoholic, but I didn’t have to watch myself. It was so much more exciting to play that character that didn’t worry about her appearance in any way. I knew that when I stood up in that bath naked it wasn’t about whether I looked good naked or not. It was about who she was.”
On playing the suicide attempt scene: “I was sitting there and this fake blood was pumping out of my arms and I was in this completely hopeless state with a kitchen knife next to me. And it was horrible, it was really horrible and I wasn’t expecting it, it was a complete surprise, and I felt awful. It sounds so pretentious, but it just made me feel horrible. I felt devastated and I felt so sad. And I’m fine. I’m great and well adjusted and everything’s cool, but just the idea of being that helpless and that lonely, it was just really sad. I got into the taxi at the end of the day and I couldn’t stop crying.”

Jean Paul Gaultier’s cotton top and skirt. Mikimoto 18k yellow gold and Akoya cultured pearl earrings; Etro bag
Prada’s silk chiffon dress. Tacori 18k yellow gold and prasiolite earrings and ring
Rochas’s blue polyester and polyamide sweater. Tom Ford sunglasses; Tacori 18k yellow gold and rose quartz earrings
Miu Miu’s cream canvas top. Tacori 18k yellow gold and rose quartz earrings
MORE FROM RED CARPET FASHION AWARDS:
Posted by Catherine Kallon on December 12th, 2011 In: Carey Mulligan, Magazines, Runway To Editorial, W Magazine














Who Was Your Best Dressed On Day 4 of Cannes Film Festival 2013?
Tamara Ralph and Michael Russo On Nieves Alvarez’ Ralph & Russo Coutu...
Freida Pinto’s Maiyet Midi Dress, Maiyet Brocade Tux Jacket And Maiyet ...
Jennifer Lawrence In Christian Dior – ‘The Hunger Games:Catching Fir...
Casey Affleck In Dior Homme – ‘Ain’t Them Bodies Saints’...
Carina Lau In Elie Saab Couture – ‘Soshite Chichi Ni Naru’ Can...

















She should grab hold of Edward Enninful and never let go. I’ve never seen her look so good. Just beautiful!
i am not a fan of the cover. Even though it’s very innocent, a bra is a bra.
I love the editiorial shots especially the Jean Gaultier and the Prada dress look better on her than on the runway.
I don’t like the cover–a bra, really? It feels tacky to me. But everything else is so classy, chic, and cute–particularly the Louis Vuitton shot and the one with the chipmunk.
I agree.
Tacky? How is it tacky? I see it as so classic and chic and pretty and not sexual at all. I love this cover shot personally
I totally agree — I think she looks gorgeous on the cover, bra & all…
Love the prada
She looks amazing. Especially that cover shot.
love it!
she’s gorgeous!
Massive use of photoshop for the cover, they change her features, so much.
I agree, but every magazine going these days over-photoshops its covers, so I’m past caring.
I think that sometimes it’s annoying, most of all on very young people; there’s no need to modify so much a photo (in my opinion), that’s why I wrote the comment. And I don’t understand why the cover only while in the editorial she looks herself…
I actually thought the opposite. She is actually recognisable, and the shot is flawless
No, its way over-photo shopped. It barely looks like her.
The picture is very beautiful but it’s not quite her. I think she’s stunning and doesn’t need anything changed. I do love the pictures purely from an artistic point though… in reality it could have been any pretty blonde girl with cropped hair with all that editing. Such a shame, her quirks are lost. She reminds me so much of Twiggy!
Wow beautiful! I just fell in love – with the Prada dress!
Stunning and so classy. I love her.
she looks like a mannequin on the cover. the editorial though is fantastic.
+1. I sat and stared at it on my kitchen table and didn’t know who I was looking at, though I thought whoever it was looked incredible. The editorial is amazing.
What a pretty cover!
She is stunning!
The editorial is great – it does so well in conveying a story just through photos.
The LV shot remind me of twiggy, everything is beautiful!!!!!!!!!
Wow she’s one stunning creature!
Love love love ths photo shoots. The styling is amazing
everything is perfect!
I love it.My fav is 4th look,but all are gorg.
stunning!
She is so amazingly beautiful. I like the cover because I am not drawn to what she is wearing which removes the tackiness of wearing just a bra, but it is her face that is the focal point – so beautiful. love the editorial shots!!
Chipmuuuunk!!!!! Sorry, but that jumped out at me and it’s just so cute!
Otherwise, I love the play of light and shadow in the 2 B&W photos.
I love the way they’ve quiffed her hair on the cover and with the chipmunk. I’m not nuts about the bra on the cover, either, but it’s a beautiful shot in terms of light, colour and texture.