It took a long while for Victoria Beckham to shake off Posh Spice and become the respected fashion designer that she is today.
She blew us away with her well tailored, beautiful chic dresses which she wore and carried with a Birkin in every colour under the rainbow.
For Spring 2011 she presented a collection of bags.
The classic bags were added to Net-A-Porter last week. Some styles sold out instantly, but the online store quickly restocked their virtual shelves.
I much admit I’m surprised they are selling so well considering the price points which range from £1,700 to £8,950.
We know Victoria’s attention to detail is second to none. She wouldn’t put her name to any product she doesn’t believe in, which is why she is her own best brand ambassador.
Check out her collection of bag available on Net-A-Porter US and Net-A-Porter International.
Credit: Bauer Griffin & Fame Pictures
- Tweet
- Tell us what you think »
- 13 Comments
MORE FROM RED CARPET FASHION AWARDS:
Posted by Catherine Kallon on March 29th, 2011 In: Victoria Beckham, Victoria Beckham Collection
Heidi Klum In Versace – ‘Nebraska’ Cannes Film Festival Premiere
Nicole Kidman In Valentino Couture – ‘Nebraska’ Cannes Film Festival Premiere
Jaime King’s Versus Safety Pin-Embellished Leather Ankle Boots
Giorgio Armani La Croisette Boutique Opening
Lea Seydoux In Dolce & Gabbana – ‘La Vie D’Adele’ Cannes Film Festival Photocall
LoveGold Will Stream The 2013 amfAR Benefit Gala Live
Hey FC, did I just missed it or you didn’t post a review for VB’s A/W 2011 Collection?
going to the press day tomorrow, so I will do it then
Thanks. Looking forward to it.
Gorgeous. Can’t afford them though.
Her bags are overpriced- they are ridiculous. Who can afford that? She is trying to get us to pay for her name . The bags are chic but not worth the prices.
“Who can afford that?” A lot of people so the bags are sold out!
They don’t carry a lot of stock so sold out can mean they sold 5
Firstly the expensive bags of £8000 plus are made of croc but for that price I rather buy a Kelly . I trust Hermes’s attention to detail. Victoria’s not so much.
And if I want a chain type bag sorry I’ll stick with a 255.
The resale value of these bags are known whilst Beckham’s are untested. For instance I bought a black Chanel 255 in 1986 for $350. I saw the exact same bag in Harvey Nichols being sold in its Vintage collection for £3000. Unfortunately my daughter took before I knew that. It is also still in wonderful condition.
I think the bags are gorgeous. Her whoel line is always sophisticated and chic and I adore the simplicity and timelessness that seems to run through her designs. On another topic, is it jsut me or is her hai rlooking MUCH less flawless and MUCH more stringy and straggley than it used to. I miss gorgeous perfect bob victoria!
Way too over priced she’s charging more than hermes which IMO are way better and even if we were paying for the name a Hermes birken is streets ahead they are classics.
I found her bags to be a little too simple, minimal, and boring for my taste. But I tend to wear classic American sportswear so my bags are little bit jazzy.
I have always thought that since she is not an established handbag designer, that her prices should have been much lower.
But to each his own. That’s what makes the world go around.
I’m a fan of her dress line as I own a few. However, I do think her handbags are just okay for the price. Maybe because it’s a relatively new line and has not with stand the test of time yet. I just know that I’ve seen them in person and have not had the urge to buy any.
just goes to show some people will buy anything with a name attached, these bags are not only overpriced but absolutely BUTT UGLY! who wants to carry around something that looks like a cement brick taken from the pavement????? madness utter madness.