Who Wore Chanel Better? Emily Mortimer or Leigh Lezark

Emily Mortimer first wore this Chanel dress from the Paris-Monte Carlo Pre-Fall 2007 collection to the “Costume Institute Benefit Gala” in New York way back in May 2007.

I think Emily looks really cute here and I like that she’s gone for a similar coloured shoe.

The gold of her belt was a nice bit of styling, as it really pops against the blue of her dress.

Leigh Lezark then wore this dress to Chanel’s “Fete D’Hiver Fall Gala” in November 2009.

I adore this dress on Leigh as I think she looks so elegant in this royal blue, yet it still reflects her edgier side.

I can’t understand why she chose to wear black pumps though. It seems like such an unthoughtful end to such a great outfit.

As Emily styled it better she wins for me.

Credit: Vogue & Wireimage

Tadashi Shoji Fall 2010

Tadashi Shoji Fall 2010

82nd Academy Awards Nominee Luncheon - Carey Mulligan In Prada

82nd Academy Awards Nominee Luncheon – Carey Mulligan In Prada

6 Responses to Who Wore Chanel Better? Emily Mortimer or Leigh Lezark

  1. wilwarin February 16, 2010 at 12:22 #

    Emily definitely, Leight got eaten by the dress…

  2. mm February 16, 2010 at 14:26 #

    I selected Emily because she looks happy and a man accessory is always a winner with me. I wasnt totally lovin the gold belt.

  3. mochababe73 February 16, 2010 at 14:30 #

    I didn’t vote for either one of them. The dress is ugly.

  4. Ksenia February 16, 2010 at 21:44 #

    Emily Mortimer looks like she was made for this dress and it fits her better.

  5. Ksenia February 16, 2010 at 21:59 #

    I honestly don’t like Leigh wearing Chanel. She, to me, seems for like the Alexander Wang and McQueen, Christopher Kane chick than a CHANEL blossom.

  6. Ksenia February 16, 2010 at 22:00 #

    Ok, Alessabdro Nivola beats any possible accessories anyone could have.

Leave a Reply

Latest on Red Carpet fashion Awards