19 Responses to “More Madonna For Louis Vuitton Fall 2009”

1. Marianna says:

   June 30, 2009 at 13:04

   FC, I imagine that it’s meant to be this false-like-a-doll face because there’s no explanation for this Bunny Ears! They’re ridiculous!

   xo

   [Reply]

   Fashion Critic's reply:

   June 30th, 2009 at 13:15

   I suppose but for me it’s just covering up the fact that’s she’s aging really badly.

   [Reply]
2. marvel says:

   June 30, 2009 at 13:06

   I hate Madonna ergo I hate these adds!!!

   I just want to get those bunny ears and stamp on them!!

   [Reply]
3. Rama Dimas says:

   June 30, 2009 at 13:12

   I think these pictures are so much better than the first picture. It’s quite edgy for LV taste. I love the negative color effects on her face.. It’s edgy

   [Reply]
4. Ally says:

   June 30, 2009 at 13:24

   I just don’t understand why they use Madonna if it ends up looking nothing like her. Although, I guess they have gotten us to talk about it here on a fashion blog when we probably wouldn’t if it was just some random person in the ad…

   [Reply]

   Fashion Critic's reply:

   June 30th, 2009 at 13:25

   I thiink you summed it up perfectly.

   [Reply]
5. Sonja says:

   June 30, 2009 at 13:32

   I kept moving the laptop screen, thinking there must be something wrong with the shade, or the light.

   That is not Madonna, that is a porcelain doll.

   [Reply]
6. Linda says:

   June 30, 2009 at 13:39

   Totally agree with FC and Ally - she is not attractive enough to be in an add, but she grabs attention, ergo the need for airbrushing to that degree. It was a compromise to get people talking about the brand.

   [Reply]
7. Alice[ says:

   June 30, 2009 at 13:56

   Too much Photoshop.Yes,she looks like a doll.
   Bah,I’m not sure about this pics,they’re weird.

   [Reply]
8. SarahV says:

   June 30, 2009 at 14:09

   I’m not quite sure how I feel about this campaign, but these pics are definitely recognizable and different from what everyone else is doing, so props for that!

   [Reply]
9. boogie says:

   June 30, 2009 at 14:09

   I really hate those computer effects!!! with these ads, clothes and bunny ears maybe LV will have an impact on the Asian market….. ;/

   [Reply]
10. mol says:

    June 30, 2009 at 15:47

    Aside from Madonna, i really like the double exposure on the face, the shadows and the colors - a very seductive, silky effect that, to me, is a lot more creative than most ads.

    [Reply]
11. Alexandra says:

    June 30, 2009 at 16:18

    the last two pictures are quite nice but i really dislike the idea of rejuvenating Madonna so dramatically. and the bunny ears… I don’t get it!

    [Reply]
12. Anastasia says:

    June 30, 2009 at 16:26

    I feel like I kinda like it, too. Those colors show as dark side of Madonna, looks magical and phantasmagoric.

    [Reply]
13. Laura says:

    June 30, 2009 at 19:01

    If I look at it as a campaign featuring madonna (whom I love, as an icon of pop and a very savvy businesswoman) it’s a terrible campaign.

    If I look at it as an ad campaign for the bags - it’s quite good and very interesting (except for the stupid bunny ears.)

    [Reply]
14. Chiara Popalopa says:

    June 30, 2009 at 19:19

    I don’t really like it mostly cause the focus is not on the bag enough, especially with those light effects… But the dresses are beautiful!

    [Reply]
15. love-fashion says:

    June 30, 2009 at 19:47

    She looks like a doll…I’m not buying it.

    [Reply]
16. suejin says:

    July 1, 2009 at 09:36

    the photos would seem similar to her last one if it weren’t for those amateur looking effects. I don’t like it all. I’m sure she would of looked fine without the weird effect.

    [Reply]
17. maggie says:

    July 1, 2009 at 16:10

    It’s common sense that you don’t mix negative effects with the original image. My poor eyes.. I wonder what the art director was thinking when these were released. because seriously - Madonna has looked SO much better in previous campaigns!!!

    Those plum-hued bags however - GORGEOUS.

    [Reply]