Net-a-porter UK
May 26th, 2009

Elsa Pataky was one of the many glamorous celebrities in the front row at Dolce & Gabbana’s Fall 2009 presentation in Milan, back in March.

She wore a Dolce & Gabbana barqoue dress from the Spring 2009 collection, which was blooming with a gorgeous beige, gold and rose floral print, which she wore with gold platform heels.

Dita Von Teese hosted a party at the VIP Room, Point Croisette during Cannes Film Festival, wearing the same dress, but with a twist.

She opted for one of the rosette jeweled belts from the Spring 2009 collection to add a bit more punch to her look, but those fuschia satin heels would have sufficed.

As Dita over cooked this dress with the belt, I’ll give this to Elsa.


This Dolce & Gabbana dress is available from Luisa via Roma.com for €1,895.

Source

Share/Save/Bookmark



6 Responses to “Who Wore Dolce & Gabbana Better? Elsa Pataky or Dita von Teese”

  1. worldofcarmela says:

    I voted Dita, but the more I look at it – I think I regret. Elsas matching with shoes, and a more tanned, natural look suits the floral dress better. However, I like it better in its shorter, original version.

    [Reply]

  2. nicole says:

    super cute dress !!! Elsa wins by a mile for me cause Dita looks bad.. from the makeup to the belt it wasnt working for me.

    [Reply]

  3. Tia says:

    This shorter hair doesn’t suit Dita- it ages her for some reason. And it kills me to say that because I’ve always adored her.

    [Reply]

  4. JacobGH says:

    um, neither? i agree that dita overcooked her look but i would also venture to say that elsa played it too safe. the dress deserves better!

    xoxo
    JGH

    [Reply]

  5. Ahot says:

    I can’t see those belts anymore.

    [Reply]

  6. ber says:

    I can’t help but be bored with Dita. It’s always the same…. same hair, same caked on makeup, same cutesy dresses. I wish she would try something slightly different.

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply

(required)
(valid email required)

Faith Shoe Group Ltd

24 queries. 0.241 seconds.